History
  • No items yet
midpage
Tucker v. R.M. Tours
958 A.2d 496
Pa.
2008
Check Treatment
958 A.2d 496 (2008)

Louis and Jacqueline TUCKER, h/w and Christina Tucker, by her Parents and Guardians, Louis and Jacqueline Tucker, Petitioners
v.
R.M. TOURS a/k/a Richard Moss Tours, Ltd. a/k/a Richard Moss Travel and Tour Agency and Apple Vacations and Leisure Travel & Tours Co., Ltd., Respondents.

No. 123 EAL 2008.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

October 8, 2008.

*497 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 8th day of October, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

May a trial court that has received a timely but unclear Statement of Errors Complained of on Appeal request a second, clearer Statement?

Case Details

Case Name: Tucker v. R.M. Tours
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 8, 2008
Citation: 958 A.2d 496
Docket Number: 123 EAL 2008
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.