History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ada Clay v. Sinclair Refining Company
194 F.2d 532
6th Cir.
1952
Check Treatment

194 F.2d 532

Ada M. CLAY, and Ada M. Clay as Executrix of the Estate of Wallace M. Clay, Deceased, Defendants-Appellants
v.
SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee.
SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY, a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
Ada M. CLAY, and Ada M. Clay as Executrix of the Estate of Wallace M. Clay, Deceased, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 11388.

No. 11389.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

January 21, 1952.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.

Carpenter & Carpenter, Tiffin, Ohio, for Ada M. Clay.

Hubert B. Fuller, Cleveland, Ohio, Eugene M. Hines, Chicago, Ill., for Sinclair Refining Co.

Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal and cross-appeal were heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel and upon consideration thereof the Court is of the opinion that there is no reversible error upon the record.

2

It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and the same is in all things affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons set forth in the memorandum Opinion of the District Judge filed January 4, 1951, 102 F. Supp. 732 and the findings of fact and conclusions of law filed January 16, 1951.

Case Details

Case Name: Ada Clay v. Sinclair Refining Company
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 21, 1952
Citation: 194 F.2d 532
Docket Number: 11389_1
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.