History
  • No items yet
midpage
Carroll v. City of Camden
220 A.2d 111
| N.J. | 1966
|
Check Treatment
47 N.J. 238 (1966)
220 A.2d 111

JOHN J. CARROLL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CITY OF CAMDEN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF CAMDEN, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC, AND THE CAMDEN CITY PLANNING BOARD, A BODY CORPORATE, POLITIC AND A MUNICIPAL AGENCY, AND THE DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY OF PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW JERSEY, A BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued May 23, 1966.
Decided June 6, 1966.

Mr. Carlton W. Rowand argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Joseph M. Nardi, Jr. argued the cause for respondent City of Camden.

Mr. Mark H. Watson argued the cause for respondent The Delaware River Port Authority of Pennsylvania and New Jersey (Mr. Thomas F. Connery, Jr., attorney).

Mr. Martin F. McKernan filed a statement on behalf of respondent The Housing Authority of the City of Camden.

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial constitutional question.

For dismissal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO — 6.

Opposed — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Carroll v. City of Camden
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jun 6, 1966
Citation: 220 A.2d 111
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.