History
  • No items yet
midpage
Davis v. State
2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 226
Mo. Ct. App.
2011
Check Treatment
331 S.W.3d 723 (2011)

Norman DAVIS, Jr., Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. ED 95298.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

February 22, 2011.

Brocca Smith, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Timothy A. Blackwell, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J.

PER CURIAM.

Norman Davis, Jr. (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Davis v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 22, 2011
Citation: 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 226
Docket Number: ED 95298
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.