History
  • No items yet
midpage
Beil v. TELESIS CONSTRUCTION, INC.
600 Pa. 628
| Pa. | 2009
|
Check Treatment
969 A.2d 1177 (2009)

David & Cheryl BEIL, Petitioners
v.
TELESIS CONSTRUCTION, INC., Lafayette College, Irwin and Leighton, Inc. and Masonry Preservation Servies, Inc., Respondents.

No. 483 EAL 2008.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

April 1, 2009.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of April, 2009, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED as to the following issues:

1. Did the Superior Court misapply Farabaugh v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, 590 Pa. 46, 911 A.2d 1264 (2006)?
2. Did the Superior Court improperly fail to view the evidence in the light most favorable to Petitioners, as verdict-winners?
3. Did the Superior Court misapply both Section 414 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965) and this Court's opinion in Byrd v. Merwin, 456 Pa. 516, 317 A.2d 280 (1974)?

Case Details

Case Name: Beil v. TELESIS CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 1, 2009
Citation: 600 Pa. 628
Docket Number: 483 EAL 2008
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.