History
  • No items yet
midpage
Narberth Borough v. Lower Merion Township
584 Pa. 542
| Pa. | 2005
|
Check Treatment
886 A.2d 223 (2005)

NARBERTH BOROUGH, Petitioner
v.
LOWER MERION TOWNSHIP; Merloc Partners, Inc.; Wynnewood Civic Association; Rosalind Nathanson and Maureen D. Witte, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

October 25, 2005.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of October, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby granted, limited to the following issues:

1. Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in holding that the Borough's notice of land use appeal was untimely filed where the Borough, an aggrieved third-party objector, filed its appeal within 30 days of the Township's entry (mailing) of its written decision pursuant to Section 1002-A of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (the "MPC"), 53 P.S. § 11002-A, and not within 30 days of the Township's oral vote?
2. Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in retroactively applying a ruling where the Commonwealth Court acknowledged the state of the law to be uncertain, where the Borough relied in good faith upon the equivocal language of the MPC, and where the Commonwealth Court's holding conflicts with this *224 Court's holding in August v. Stasak, 492 Pa. 550, 424 A.2d 1328 (1981)?

Case Details

Case Name: Narberth Borough v. Lower Merion Township
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Oct 25, 2005
Citation: 584 Pa. 542
Docket Number: Petition 602 & 603 MAL 2004
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.