History
  • No items yet
midpage
Love v. Snyder
184 F.2d 840
| 6th Cir. | 1950
|
Check Treatment

184 F.2d 840

LOVE,
v.
SNYDER et al.

No. 11113.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 19, 1950.

Harold R. Love; in pro per.

Ray J. O'Donnell and Frank J. Richter, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellees.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This case came on to be heard on the record and briefs and argument on behalf of the appellees, appellant not appearing.

2

And it appearing from the undisputed facts of the record that the alleged defamatory statements were published by officials acting within the scope of their authority and in the performance of duties imposed upon then by law, Gibson v. Reynolds, 8 Cir., 172 F.2d 95, 97-99, during an investigation duly authorized in connection with appeal proceedings instituted before a quasijudicial body, namely, the United States Civil Service Commission;

3

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be, and it hereby is affirmed for the reasons stated in its findings of fact and conclusions of law filed December 6, 1949. Dodez v. Weygandt, 6 Cir., 173 F.2d 965; Sacks v. Stecker, 2 Cir., 60 F.2d 73: Bleecker v. Drury, 2 Cir., 149 F.2d 770.

Case Details

Case Name: Love v. Snyder
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Oct 19, 1950
Citation: 184 F.2d 840
Docket Number: 11113_1
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.