History
  • No items yet
midpage
Martin Jessee Motors, Inc. v. Reading Co.
181 F.2d 766
| 3rd Cir. | 1950
|
Check Treatment

181 F.2d 766

MARTIN JESSEE MOTORS, Inc.
v.
READING CO.

No. 10135.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued April 4, 1950.

Decided May 1, 1950.

J. E. Marks, Lexington, Ky., Louis Levitt, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Thomas Raeburn White, Philadelphia, Pa., W. Wilson White, White, Williams & Scott, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and GOODRICH and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

We have carefully considered the points raised by the appellant in its brief and oral argument. The appellant was victimized by an apparent fraud but the Reading Company had no part therein and should not be compelled to shoulder the blame. The loss must lie on the appellant where it has fallen. The appellant bases its claim upon Section 22 of the Bill of Lading Act, as amended, 49 U.S.C.A. § 102. It can prevail under that Act only by proving its title to specific property. It has not done so and therefore the decision of the court below is correct.

2

Accordingly we will affirm the judgment upon the able opinion of Judge Follmer, D.C., 87 F.Supp. 318.

Case Details

Case Name: Martin Jessee Motors, Inc. v. Reading Co.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Date Published: May 1, 1950
Citation: 181 F.2d 766
Docket Number: 10135
Court Abbreviation: 3rd Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.