History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ring Engineering Co. v. Otis Elevator Co.
179 F.2d 812
| D.C. Cir. | 1950
|
Check Treatment

179 F.2d 812

RING ENGINEERING CO.
v.
OTIS ELEVATOR CO.

No. 10116.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued December 14, 1949.

Decided January 23, 1950.

Mr. James M. Earnest, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Mr. Philip W. Amram, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Jerome J. Dick, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, CLARK, and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This case involves interpretation of a contract for installing elevators in an office building in Washington, D. C. We agree with the District Court's interpretation. Furthermore, appellant may not overturn a summary judgment by raising here an issue of fact that was not plainly disclosed as a genuine issue in the trial court. Fletcher v. Krise, 73 App.D.C. 266, 120 F.2d 809; Williams v. Kolb, 79 U.S. App.D.C. 253, 145 F.2d 344. Garrett Biblical Institute v. American University, 82 U.S.App.D.C., 265, 163 F.2d 265, is not to the contrary.

2

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Ring Engineering Co. v. Otis Elevator Co.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Date Published: Jan 23, 1950
Citation: 179 F.2d 812
Docket Number: 10116
Court Abbreviation: D.C. Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.