History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. Williams
112 N.E.2d 305
| Ind. Ct. App. | 1953
|
Check Treatment
123 Ind. App. 495 (1953)
112 N.E.2d 305

WILLIAMS
v.
WILLIAMS ET AL.

No. 18,420.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

Filed May 18, 1953.

*496 F. Kenneth Dempsey, of South Bend, and William N. Kenefick and Paul F. Jackson, both of Michigan City, for appellant.

Krueger & Fox, and Raymond F. Fox, Jr., of Michigan City, and Fred E. Stafford, of Marked Tree, Arkansas, for appellees.

ROYSE, C.J.

Appellant filed her brief in this court April 17, 1953. Appellee Williams has filed his petition to affirm the judgment because appellant's brief does not comply with Rule 2-17, Rules of the Supreme Court of Indiana.

An examination of appellant's brief discloses it is not indexed; it does not set out a concise statement of the record or the assignment of errors here. This court could not determine whether or not appellant has properly presented a question without searching the record. Since the filing of appellee's motion, appellant has neither filed a request to amend her brief nor made any reply to said motion. While we always prefer to decide cases on their merits we may not do so when an appellant fails to comply with the Rules of the Supreme Court.

Judgment affirmed.

NOTE. — Reported in 112 N.E.2d 405.

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. Williams
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 18, 1953
Citation: 112 N.E.2d 305
Docket Number: 18,420
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.