History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Salazar
1993 Minn. LEXIS 48
| Minn. | 1993
|
Check Treatment
494 N.W.2d 485 (1993)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Ruben James SALAZAR, Appellant.

No. C9-92-228.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

January 28, 1993.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Ruben James Salazar for further review of the unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals affirming his criminal sexual conduct convictions be, and the same is, granted for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals, which is instructed to engage in the kind of analysis contemplated by Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805, 110 S.Ct. 3139, 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990), articulating the circumstances surrounding the making of the out-of-court statements demonstrating the particular trustworthiness of the statements. By remanding for this purpose, we express no opinion as to the merits of the issue. Remanded to court of appeals.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Salazar
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Jan 28, 1993
Citation: 1993 Minn. LEXIS 48
Docket Number: C9-92-228
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.