History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hale v. Antoniou
2003 Me. 52
| Me. | 2003
|
Check Treatment
820 A.2d 586 (2003)
2003 ME 52

Michael HALE et al.
v.
Demetri ANTONIOU.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Argued: January 14, 2003.
Decided: April 15, 2003.

Michael J. Waxman (orally), Portland, for plaintiffs.

Peter J. DeTroy, Russell B. Pierce Jr. (orally), Norman, Hanson & DeTroy, LLC, Portland, for defendant.

Panel: CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, ALEXANDER, CALKINS, and LEVY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Demetri Antoniou appeals from an order entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Humphrey, J.) denying his motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to stay judicial proceedings. The underlying action involves claims Michael and Edie Hale brought on behalf of their son, Jordan, against Antoniou for intentional infliction of emotional distress and civil assault. Antoniou asserts that the Superior Court erred in concluding that USA Hockey Inc.'s arbitration procedure did not govern the Hales' claims. Because the Court is evenly divided, we affirm the judgment.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hale v. Antoniou
Court Name: Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Date Published: Apr 15, 2003
Citation: 2003 Me. 52
Court Abbreviation: Me.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.