History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Budke
1985 Minn. LEXIS 1144
| Minn. | 1985
|
Check Treatment
371 N.W.2d 533 (1985)

STATE of Minnesota, petitioner, Appellant,
v.
Donald BUDKE and Kathleen Budke, Respondents.

No. CX-84-211.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 19, 1985.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Thomas J. Barrett, Sp. Asst., St. Paul, Waldemar D. Senyk, Asst. Otter Tail County Atty., Fergus Falls, for appellant.

John A. Eidsmoe, Tulas, Okl., Roger Oldenkamp, Fergus Falls, for Budkes.

Clyde F. Anderson, Council of Christian Home Educators, Minneapolis, John W. Whitehead, Manassas, Va., Wendell R. Bird, Richard W. Summers, Atlanta, Ga., amicus curiae.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.

WAHL, Justice.

Donald and Kathleen Budke were convicted of violating Minnesota's compulsory school attendance law. On appeal, a three-judge district court panel reversed their convictions based on its belief that the Budke's first amendment rights had been infringed.

We affirm the reversal of the Budkes' convictions for the reasons set forth in our opinion in State v. Newstrom, 371 N.W.2d 525 (Minn.1985). We do not reach the first amendment issues raised in this appeal.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Budke
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Jul 19, 1985
Citation: 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1144
Docket Number: CX-84-211
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.