History
  • No items yet
midpage
DEPT. OF LAW & PUBLIC SAFETY v. Merlino
109 N.J. 134
| N.J. | 1988
|
Check Treatment
109 N.J. 134 (1988)
535 A.2d 968

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY, DIVISION OF GAMING ENFORCEMENT, RESPONDENT,
v.
LAWRENCE MERLINO, APPELLANT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY, DIVISION OF GAMING ENFORCEMENT, RESPONDENT,
v.
PHILIP LEONETTI, APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued December 1, 1987.
Decided January 20, 1988.

Peter L. Bruso argued the cause for appellant, Philip Leonetti (Jacobs, Todd & Bruso, attorneys; Edwin J. Jacobs, Jr., of counsel; Edwin J. Jacobs, Jr., and Rosemary A. Cain, on the briefs).

Michael L. Testa argued the cause for appellant, Lawrence Merlino (Basile, Testa & Testa, attorneys).

Gary A. Ehrlich, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (W. Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Gary A. Ehrlich and Anthony J. Parrillo, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel).

Dennis Daly, Senior Assistant Counsel, argued the cause for respondent New Jersey Casino Control Commission (Robert J. Genatt, General Counsel, attorney; Dennis Daly and Carole R. Jacobson, Assistant Counsel, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, 216 N.J. Super. 579.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: DEPT. OF LAW & PUBLIC SAFETY v. Merlino
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jan 20, 1988
Citation: 109 N.J. 134
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.