History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Krieger
475 A.2d 563
| N.J. | 1984
|
Check Treatment
96 N.J. 256 (1984)
475 A.2d 563

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
LAWRENCE KRIEGER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued May 1, 1984.
Decided May 16, 1984.

Gary H. Schlyen, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Joseph A. Falcone, Passaic County Prosecutor, attorney; Margaret Ann F. Mullins, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief).

Robert A. Jacobson, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for respondent (Joseph H. Rodriguez, Public Defender, attorney).

*257 PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Michels, reported at 193 N.J. Super. 568, 579 (1983).

For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices SCHREIBER, O'HERN and GARIBALDI — 4.

For affirmance — Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER and POLLOCK — 3.

CLIFFORD, HANDLER, and POLLOCK, JJ., dissenting:

We would affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the majority of that court, reported at 193 N.J. Super. 568 (1983).

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Krieger
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 16, 1984
Citation: 475 A.2d 563
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.