History
  • No items yet
midpage
State in Interest of BD
266 A.2d 303
| N.J. | 1970
|
Check Treatment
56 N.J. 325 (1970)
266 A.2d 303

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, IN THE INTEREST OF B.D., A JUVENILE, JUVENILE-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued June 1, 1970.
Decided June 19, 1970.

Mr. David S. Baime, Assistant Prosecutor of Essex County, argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Prosecutor, attorney).

Mr. Donald H. Mintz argued the cause for the respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Sullivan in the Appellate Division. 110 N.J. Super. 585.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: State in Interest of BD
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jun 19, 1970
Citation: 266 A.2d 303
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.