History
  • No items yet
midpage
Philadelphia v. Stadler
173 N.J. Super. 235
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | 1980
|
Check Treatment
173 N.J. Super. 235 (1980)
413 A.2d 996

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
HENRY H. STADLER, SALVATORE DIMARTINO, JOSEPH A. SULPIZIE, JAMES SPROULES AND JAMES M. MCCULLOGH, JR., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 1, 1980.
Decided April 18, 1980.

Before Judges FRITZ, KOLE and LANE.

William S. Ruggierio argued the cause for appellant (Ruggierio & Freeman, attorneys).

Charles Crabbe Thomas argued the cause for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment essentially for the reasons given in Judge Wells' published opinion. Philadelphia v. Stadler, 164 N.J. Super. 281 (Cty.D.Ct. 1978). See, also, Philadelphia v. Smith, 82 N.J. 429 (1980), aff'g 169 N.J. Super. 156 (App.Div. 1979).

We find no merit to any of the contentions raised on this appeal as grounds for reversal.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Philadelphia v. Stadler
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: Apr 18, 1980
Citation: 173 N.J. Super. 235
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.