History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sexton v. Essex County Ritualarium
21 N.J. Super. 329
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | 1952
|
Check Treatment
21 N.J. Super. 329 (1952)
91 A.2d 162

ISAAC JOSEPH SEXTON, PHILIP BLUME, ISIDORE MILLER, JOSEPH MILLER, LOUIS HEYMAN, DEBORAH RUBIN, VICTOR R. LEVEY, MARY B. LEVEY, HIS WIFE, FRED N. NICOLACOPULOS AND ANNA GRANT, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
ESSEX COUNTY RITUALARIUM, AN UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION, AND ESSEX COUNTY RITUALARIUM SYNAGOGUE, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 8, 1952.
Decided September 10, 1952.

Before Judges JAYNE, PROCTOR, and SCHETTINO.

Mr. Harry Green argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Hodes & Hodes, attorneys; Mr. William Hodes).

Mr. Bernard Freedman argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Koehler, Augenblick & Freedman, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Ewart in Sexton v. Bates, 17 N.J. Super. 246 (Law Div. 1951).

Case Details

Case Name: Sexton v. Essex County Ritualarium
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: Sep 10, 1952
Citation: 21 N.J. Super. 329
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.