Murphy v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF CITY OF STAMFORD273 Conn. 910 Conn.2005Check Treatment 870 A.2d 1080 (2005) 273 Conn. 910 Karen A. MURPHY et al. v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF the CITY OF STAMFORD et al. Supreme Court of Connecticut. Decided March 2, 2005. Karen A. Murphy, pro se, and Kathleen A. Murphy, pro se, in support of the petition. John W. Mullin, assistant corporation counsel, in opposition. The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn.App. 147, 860 A.2d 764 (2004), is denied.
