History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wolf v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
2010 Minn. LEXIS 532
| Minn. | 2010
|
Check Treatment
787 N.W.2d 575 (2010)

Pamela A. WOLF, Respondent,
v.
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Companies, Relators.

No. A10-809.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

August 26, 2010.

Gary L. Manka, Katz, Manka, Teplinsky, Graves & Sobol, Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent.

Mary E. Kohl, Stacey A. Molde, Johnson & Condon, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for relators.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 12, 2010, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Case Details

Case Name: Wolf v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Aug 26, 2010
Citation: 2010 Minn. LEXIS 532
Docket Number: A10-809
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.