History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ray v. State
348 Ark. 304
| Ark. | 2002
|
Check Treatment
73 S.W.3d 594 (2002)
348 Ark. 304

Timothy RAY
v.
STATE of Arkansas.

No. CR 02-317.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

April 18, 2002.

Wright & Vannoy, by: Herbert T. Wright, Little Rock, for appellant.

No response.

MOTION FOR RULE ON THE CLERK

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Timothy Ray, by and through his attorney, Herbert T. Wright, has filed a motion for belated appeal, which will be treated as a motion for rule on the clerk. See Johnson v. State, 342 Ark. 709, 30 S.W.3d 715 (2000) (citing Muhammed v. State, 330 Ark. 759, 957 S.W.2d 692 (1997)). Mr. Wright admits in the instant motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

Accordingly, we grant the motion for rule on the clerk. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Case Details

Case Name: Ray v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Apr 18, 2002
Citation: 348 Ark. 304
Docket Number: CR 02-317
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.