History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dillard v. HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT AND/OR EDS SYSTEMS
144 N.J. 326
| N.J. | 1996
|
Check Treatment
144 N.J. 326 (1996)
676 A.2d 1065

CHRISTINE DILLARD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT AND/OR EDS SYSTEMS, AS SERVICING AGENT FOR THE NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION (NJAFIUA), DEFENDANTS, AND NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION (NJAFIUA), DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued October 23, 1995.
Decided June 11, 1996.

Robert G. Engelhart argued the cause for appellant (Gebhardt & Kiefer, attorneys).

Raymond T. Sheldon argued the cause for respondent (Surdovel & Sheldon, attorneys).

*327 PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 277 N.J. Super. 448, 650 A.2d 1 (1994). We add that the coverage afforded under the policy is limited to the statutory coverage required by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-3 and N.J.S.A. 39:6B-1 in accordance with the holding in Marotta v. New Jersey Automobile Full Insurance Underwriting Association, 144 N.J. 325, 676 A.2d 1064 (1996), also decided today.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.

Opposed — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Dillard v. HERTZ CLAIM MANAGEMENT AND/OR EDS SYSTEMS
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jun 11, 1996
Citation: 144 N.J. 326
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.