History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hallman v. Hallman
59 Del. 145
| Del. | 1965
|
Check Treatment
215 A.2d 427 (1965)

Richard D. HALLMAN, Plaintiff Below, Appellant,
v.
Elizabeth K. HALLMAN, Defendant Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

November 23, 1965.

Robert C. O'Hora, Wilmington, for appellant.

Henry N. Herndon, Jr., of Morris, James, Hitchens & Williams, Wilmington, for appellee.

WOLCOTT, C. J., and CAREY and HERRMANN, JJ., sitting.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial of a husband's complaint for divorce upon the ground of mutual voluntary separation of husband and wife with no prospect of reconciliation (13 Del.C. § 1522(11). The trial judge held that the husband had failed by a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the separation was mutually voluntary. We have examined the record and are of the opinion that the husband's evidence was not so clearly sufficient in support of his case that the trial judge's conclusions should be disturbed.

The judgment below is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hallman v. Hallman
Court Name: Supreme Court of Delaware
Date Published: Nov 23, 1965
Citation: 59 Del. 145
Docket Number: 22, 1964
Court Abbreviation: Del.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.