History
  • No items yet
midpage
Duran v. Andrew
2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1330
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2009
|
Check Treatment
295 S.W.3d 183 (2009)

Janeen M. DURAN, Respondent,
v.
Christopher ANDREW, Appellant.

No. ED 92731.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

September 22, 2009.

David M. Heimos, Clayton, MO, for Appellant.

Patrick J. McCarthy, St. Louis, MO, for Respondent.

Before KENNETH M. ROMINES, C.J., KURT S. ODENWALD, P.J., and GEORGE W. DRAPER III, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Christopher Andrew (hereinafter, "Andrew") appeals from the trial court's judgment entering a full order of protection against him pursuant to Section 455.040 RSMo (2000)[1] for abuse or stalking of Janeen M. Duran. Andrew raises one point on appeal, claiming there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate Andrew violated Section 455.010 et seq.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

NOTES

[1] All further references herein are to RSMo (2000).

Case Details

Case Name: Duran v. Andrew
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 22, 2009
Citation: 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1330
Docket Number: ED 92731
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.