History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Pacheco
258 A.2d 368
| N.J. | 1969
|
Check Treatment
54 N.J. 579 (1969)
258 A.2d 368

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
VICTOR PACHECO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 5, 1969.
Decided November 17, 1969.

Mrs. Miriam N. Span, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for the appellant (Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).

Mr. Ruston H. Ridgway, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Joseph Tuso, Cumberland County Prosecutor, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division, 106 N.J. Super. 540.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Pacheco
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Nov 17, 1969
Citation: 258 A.2d 368
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.