History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hartman v. Caddington
255 Md. 651
| Md. | 1969
|
Check Treatment
255 Md. 651 (1969)
258 A.2d 740

HARTMAN ET AL.
v.
CADDINGTON

[No. 106, September Term, 1969.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided November 20, 1969.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, FINAN, SINGLEY and SMITH, JJ.

Robert E. Bullard for appellants.

Frank W. Wilson for appellee.

PER CURIAM:

The appeal must be dismissed because there was no final judgment below from which an appeal could be taken. After a jury verdict, appellants filed a motion for judgment n.o.v. or in the alternative a new trial and the trial court granted a new trial.

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Case Details

Case Name: Hartman v. Caddington
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Maryland
Date Published: Nov 20, 1969
Citation: 255 Md. 651
Docket Number: [No. 106, September Term, 1969.]
Court Abbreviation: Md.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.