History
  • No items yet
midpage
Roselle v. City of East Orange
37 N.J. 462
| N.J. | 1962
|
Check Treatment
37 N.J. 462 (1962)
181 A.2d 751

PIETRO ROSELLE, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE CITY OF EAST ORANGE, COUNTY OF ESSEX, NEW JERSEY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued June 4, 1962.
Decided June 11, 1962.

Mr. Samuel A. Larner argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Budd, Larner & Kent, attorneys).

Mr. William P. Reiss argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. William L. Brach, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons given by the trial court in an opinion reported under the name of Greggio v. Orange, 69 N.J. Super. 453 (1961).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Roselle v. City of East Orange
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Jun 11, 1962
Citation: 37 N.J. 462
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.