History
  • No items yet
midpage
Maplewood Bank v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
135 N.J. 97
| N.J. | 1994
|
Check Treatment
135 N.J. 97 (1994)
638 A.2d 140

THE MAPLEWOOD BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND EDWARD CAPERS, TERRE CAPERS, AND NEW JERSEY SAVINGS BANK, DEFENDANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued February 15, 1994.
Decided March 15, 1994.

Sheldon H. Pressler argued the cause for appellant (Pressler and Pressler, attorneys; Raymond A. Noble, of counsel; Mr. Noble and Steven P. McCabe, on the brief).

Alan R. Ostrowitz argued the cause for respondent (Ostrowitz & Ostrowitz, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the Appellate Division opinion, reported at 265 N.J. Super. 25, 625 A.2d 537 (1993).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI, and STEIN join in this opinion. — 7.

Opposed — none.

Case Details

Case Name: Maplewood Bank v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Mar 15, 1994
Citation: 135 N.J. 97
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.