History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Patterson
270 N.J. Super. 562
| N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. | 1994
|
Check Treatment
270 N.J. Super. 562 (1994)
637 A.2d 599

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
CHARLES PATTERSON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
RONALD JOHNSON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted January 24, 1994.
Decided February 18, 1994.

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN and LEVY.

John Kaye, Monmouth County Prosecutor, attorney for appellant (Mark P. Stalford, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel).

Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney for respondent Patterson (Linda Mehling, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, of counsel and on the letter brief).

Zulima V. Farber, Public Defender, attorney for respondent Johnson (Mordecai Garelick, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, of counsel and on the letter brief).

PER CURIAM.

The order dated January 22, 1993, suppressing evidence seized from defendants is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge O'Hagan in his opinion reported at 270 N.J. Super. 550, 637 A.2d 593 (Law Div. 1994).

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Patterson
Court Name: New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Date Published: Feb 18, 1994
Citation: 270 N.J. Super. 562
Court Abbreviation: N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.