History
  • No items yet
midpage
DHM INDUSTRIES v. Central Port Warehouse
318 A.2d 19
| N.J. | 1974
|
Check Treatment
64 N.J. 548 (1974)
318 A.2d 19

D.H.M. INDUSTRIES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CENTRAL PORT WAREHOUSES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND CORBIN-BAY REALTY CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, D.H. OVERMYER, CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND D.H. OVERMYER CO., INC., AN OHIO CORPORATION, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 19, 1974.
Decided April 2, 1974.

*549 Mr. Burton T. Cohen, argued the cause for appellant (Walter Henry Jones, attorney).

Mr. David J. Goldberg, argued the cause for respondent D.H.M. Industries, Inc. (Messrs. Warren, Goldberg & Berman, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority's per curiam opinion.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices HALL, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD — 6.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: DHM INDUSTRIES v. Central Port Warehouse
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Apr 2, 1974
Citation: 318 A.2d 19
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.