History
  • No items yet
midpage
Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod & Gutnick
528 Pa. 345
| Pa. | 1991
|
Check Treatment
528 Pa. 345 (1991)
598 A.2d 27

In re Pamela MUHAMMAD, Administratrix of the Estate of Nazir Muhammad and Abdullah Muhammad
v.
STRASSBURGER, McKENNA, MESSER, SHILOBOD AND GUTNICK, etc., et al.
Appeal of STRASSBURGER, McKENNA, MESSER, SHILOBOD AND GUTNICK, a law partnership; and Howard Messer.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 8, 1991.

PER CURIAM.

And now, this 8th day of May, 1991, the Petitioners', Pamela Muhammad, Administratrix for the Estate of Nazir *346 Muhammad and Abdullah Muhammad, petitions for reargument and for clarification are hereby DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

Case Details

Case Name: Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod & Gutnick
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 8, 1991
Citation: 528 Pa. 345
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.