History
  • No items yet
midpage
De Nardis v. Stevens Construction Co.
184 A.2d 417
| N.J. | 1962
|
Check Treatment
38 N.J. 300 (1962)
184 A.2d 417

GIUSEPPE DE NARDIS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
STEVENS CONSTRUCTION CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued September 11, 1962.
Decided September 24, 1962.

Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Thomas E. Weinstock argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Bendit & Weinstock, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Sullivan in the Appellate Division.

Mr. Justice HALL and Mr. Justice HANEMAN vote to reverse the judgment for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion of Judge Price.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR and SCHETTINO — 5.

For reversal — Justices HALL and HANEMAN — 2.

Case Details

Case Name: De Nardis v. Stevens Construction Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Sep 24, 1962
Citation: 184 A.2d 417
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.