History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Ouellette
289 Conn. 951
| Conn. | 2008
|
Check Treatment
961 A.2d 417 (2008)
289 Conn. 951

STATE of Connecticut
v.
Daniel J. OUELLETTE.

SC 18273.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided November 24, 2008.

Richard A. Reeve, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 110 Conn.App. 401, 955 A.2d 582 (20081), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*418 "In circumstances where the prosecutor adduced evidence that the state had entered into a plea agreement with its key witness pursuant to which the state would seek a particular sentence but then, after that witness' trial testimony, the state recommended a different, more lenient sentence for the witness, did the Appellate Court improperly refuse to remand the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of whether the state's conduct violated the defendant's due process rights?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18273.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Ouellette
Court Name: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Date Published: Nov 24, 2008
Citation: 289 Conn. 951
Docket Number: SC 18273
Court Abbreviation: Conn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.