History
  • No items yet
midpage
Grosvenor v. State
816 So. 2d 822
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2002
|
Check Treatment
816 So. 2d 822 (2002)

Traci Ann GROSVENOR, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D01-905.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

May 17, 2002.

Robert S. Griscti, Gainesville, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. See Siegel v. State, 586 So. 2d 1341, 1342 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)(in order to maintain a claim of ineffective assistance with either a nolo contendere or guilty plea, a defendant must show that he had a viable defense); Diaz v. State, 534 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). We certify conflict with Cousino v. State, 770 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) and Mason v. State, 742 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), both of which held that it was not necessary to demonstrate a viable defense to obtain relief in these types of cases.

AFFIRMED.

THOMPSON, C.J., COBB and ORFINGER, R. B., JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Grosvenor v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 17, 2002
Citation: 816 So. 2d 822
Docket Number: 5D01-905
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.