History
  • No items yet
midpage
City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order of Police
592 Pa. 454
| Pa. | 2007
|
Check Treatment
926 A.2d 437 (2007)

CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Respondent,
v.
FRATERNAL ORDER of POLICE, Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 22, 2007.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 22nd day of May 2007, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, as to the following issue:

Whether the Commonwealth Court's decision permitting the reduction of post-retirement healthcare benefits for active officers conflicts with the Supreme Court's decision in Appeal of Upper Providence Township, 514 Pa. 501, 526 A.2d 315 (1987)?

In briefing this issue, the parties are directed to address whether the arbitrator's award approving a capping of contributions for healthcare benefits for future retirees constitutes a diminishment in benefits in a present employee's pension or retirement system.

Case Details

Case Name: City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order of Police
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 22, 2007
Citation: 592 Pa. 454
Docket Number: 678, 679 WAL 2006
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.