History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ortiz v. State
689 So. 2d 353
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1997
|
Check Treatment
689 So.2d 353 (1997)

Manfredo ORTIZ, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 95-03622.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 14, 1997.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Allyn Giambalvo, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ron Napolitano, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant's judgment and sentence. Because this court lacks the authority to review the trial court's order denying the appellant's motion for case reassignment, we are precluded from reaching the substantive issues raised. Wild v. Dozier, 672 So.2d 16, 18 (Fla.1996).

Affirmed.

PATTERSON, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Ortiz v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 14, 1997
Citation: 689 So. 2d 353
Docket Number: 95-03622
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.