History
  • No items yet
midpage
Huffman v. State
360 So. 2d 1045
| Ala. | 1978
|
Check Treatment
360 So.2d 1045 (1978)

In re Bertha Mae HUFFMAN
v.
STATE.
Ex Parte Bertha Mae Huffman.

77-182.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 14, 1978.

Robert T. Meadows, III and David B. Byrne, Jr., Montgomery, for petitioner.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen. and Milton E. Belcher, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State, respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The Court of Criminal Appeals, 360 So.2d 1038, on original deliverance, properly pretermitted review of the defendant's contention that remarks of the prosecutor in closing argument require reversal, because argument of counsel was not included in the record on appeal.

The record has now been supplemented under ARAP 10(f) and we have thoroughly reviewed it after hearing oral argument by the petitioner. We find no reversible error and, therefore, affirm the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

AFFIRMED.

All the Justices concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Huffman v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jul 14, 1978
Citation: 360 So. 2d 1045
Docket Number: 77-182
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.