History
  • No items yet
midpage
Aikens v. State
609 So. 2d 764
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1992
|
Check Treatment
609 So. 2d 764 (1992)

Terrance AIKENS, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 91-2809.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

December 8, 1992.

Rubin, Rubin & Rubin and Eric J. Miller and Robert Borrello, Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Randall Sutton, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, FERGUSON and GODERICH, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On direct and circumstantial evidence identifying the defendant as the perpetrator *765 of the charged offenses, the court properly denied motions for judgment of acquittal and submitted the case to the jury. Yuanis v. State, 347 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

The reason given by the State in peremptorily challenging a black venireperson — that a close relative had been charged with a similar offense — was sufficiently race neutral to justify removal. Bowden v. State, 588 So. 2d 225 (Fla. 1991), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S. Ct. 1596, 118 L. Ed. 2d 311 (1992).

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Aikens v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 8, 1992
Citation: 609 So. 2d 764
Docket Number: 91-2809
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.