History
  • No items yet
midpage
Shotkin v. Deehl
148 So. 2d 538
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1963
|
Check Treatment
148 So.2d 538 (1963)

Bernard M. SHOTKIN, Appellant,
v.
Robert M. DEEHL, Appellee.

No. 62-648.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

January 8, 1963.
Rehearing Denied January 28, 1963.

*539 Bernard M. Shotkin, in pro. per.

Charles H. Wakeman, Jr., Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, TILLMAN, C.J., and CARROLL and HORTON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

By order of the court and upon the appellee's motion to quash and the appellant's motion for constitutional stay, oral argument of the respective parties was heard.

The instant appeal was from an order granting a motion to dismiss. The form of the order, which merely granted the motion, renders it non-appealable. Baker v. Colley, Fla.App. 1958, 104 So.2d 473. Moreover, an examination of the record and the order appealed discloses that the appellant is attempting to join third party defendants in support of a claim not germane to nor growing out of the plaintiff's action. This constitutes third party practice and is not permitted by the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. See Pan American Surety Co. v. Jefferson Construction Co., Fla.App. 1958, 99 So.2d 726. Cf. Rule 14, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The motion for stay is accordingly denied and the appeal is dismissed.

Case Details

Case Name: Shotkin v. Deehl
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jan 8, 1963
Citation: 148 So. 2d 538
Docket Number: 62-648
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.