History
  • No items yet
midpage
Arthur v. State
1991 WL 32293
| Ala. | 1991
|
Check Treatment
575 So. 2d 1191 (1991)

Ex parte State of Alabama.
(Re Thomas Douglas ARTHUR
v.
STATE).

1900220.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

February 22, 1991.

Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and Andy S. Poole and William D. Little, Asst. Attys. Gen., for petitioner.

William Hovater, Tuscumbia, and H. Alan Gargis, Muscle Shoals, for respondent.

Prior report: Ala.Cr.App., 575 So. 2d 1165.

PER CURIAM.

WRIT DENIED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES, ADAMS and INGRAM, JJ., concur.

HOUSTON, STEAGALL and KENNEDY, JJ., dissent.

HOUSTON, Justice (dissenting).

I think that this case is distinguishable from Arizona v. Roberson, 486 U.S. 675, 108 S. Ct. 2093, 100 L. Ed. 2d 704 (1988). I would reverse the judgment and remand the cause to the Court of Criminal Appeals.

STEAGALL, J., concurs.

Case Details

Case Name: Arthur v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Feb 22, 1991
Citation: 1991 WL 32293
Docket Number: 1900220
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.