History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hofeling v. Hofeling
546 So. 2d 1176
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1989
|
Check Treatment
546 So. 2d 1176 (1989)

Blaine Thomas HOFELING, Appellant,
v.
Laura Catherine HOFELING (Witkowski), Appellee.

No. 88-01441.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

August 2, 1989.

Thomas D. Koch, Clearwater, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

LEHAN, Judge.

We reverse the trial court's order adjudicating appellant guilty of indirect criminal contempt. The proceedings leading to the entry of the order were not conducted in conformity with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840 in the following respects: (1) the order to show cause lacked proper predicates, see Paris v. Paris, 427 So. 2d 1080 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Deter v. Deter, 353 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977); (2) defendant, being absent from the contempt hearing, was not afforded rights given by rule 3.840(a)(4) and (a)(7), see Bradley v. State, 420 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); and (3) the order from which this appeal has been taken does not recite the facts constituting the contempt as required by rule 3.840(a)(7), see White v. Buck, 505 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

Reversed.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hofeling v. Hofeling
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Aug 2, 1989
Citation: 546 So. 2d 1176
Docket Number: 88-01441
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.