History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hawryluk v. State
543 So. 2d 1318
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1989
|
Check Treatment
543 So.2d 1318 (1989)

Matthew Edward HAWRYLUK, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 88-2145.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

June 1, 1989.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Larry B. Henderson, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Kellie A. Nielan and Bonnie Jean Parrish, Asst. Attys. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a guideline sentence. Because the sentencing judge did not render contemporaneous written reasons justifying the departure-from-the-guidelines sentence we must vacate the sentence and remand for proper resentencing. State v. Oden, 478 So.2d 51 (Fla. 1985). We have been told that the sentencing judge rendered written reasons over three months after the pronouncement of the sentence. This was ineffectual because this court, not the trial court, had jurisdiction of the case by that time, due to the filing of the notice of appeal.

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

ORFINGER and COBB, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hawryluk v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jun 1, 1989
Citation: 543 So. 2d 1318
Docket Number: 88-2145
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.