History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pepper v. State
2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 57
| Mo. Ct. App. | 2007
|
Check Treatment
211 S.W.3d 185 (2007)

Dana PEPPER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

No. WD 66534.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

January 16, 2007.

Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia, MO, attorney for Appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Jefferson City, MO, attorney for Respondent.

Before: ROBERT G. ULRICH, P.J., HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, and EDWIN H. SMITH, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dana Pepper appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He sought to vacate his conviction and ten-year sentence for sale of a controlled substance near schools, section 195.214, RSMo 2000. Mr. Pepper claims on appeal that his guilty plea was not entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily because he was not afforded the benefit of an agreement that he reasonably believed he had with the prosecutor. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Pepper v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 16, 2007
Citation: 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 57
Docket Number: WD 66534
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.