History
  • No items yet
midpage
Phan v. RADISSON HOTEL
2006 Minn. LEXIS 277
| Minn. | 2006
|
Check Treatment
712 N.W.2d 759 (2006)

Minh-Phuong T. PHAN, Respondent,
v.
RADISSON HOTEL, and American Compensation Insurance/RTW, Relators.

No. A06-22.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

April 26, 2006.

Brian James Holly, Asfedt, Forde, Gray, Monson & Hager, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for Appellant.

Minh-Phuong T. Phan, St. Paul MN, Pro Se Respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed December 6, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Russell A. Anderson Chief Justice

Case Details

Case Name: Phan v. RADISSON HOTEL
Court Name: Supreme Court of Minnesota
Date Published: Apr 26, 2006
Citation: 2006 Minn. LEXIS 277
Docket Number: A06-22
Court Abbreviation: Minn.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.