History
  • No items yet
midpage
Connell v. Riggins
820 So. 2d 1076
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2002
|
Check Treatment
820 So. 2d 1076 (2002)

Robert Carter CONNELL, and Connell & Son, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Appellants,
v.
Mary RIGGINS and Bruce Riggins, individually, and Mary Riggins, as Guardian of the person and property of Caleb Riggins, Appellees.

No. 1D01-3844.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

July 16, 2002.

Stephen E. Day, and Rhonda B. Boggess, of Taylor, Day & Currie, Jacksonville, for Appellants.

Fletcher Farrington, Savannah, Georgia; Robert F. Spohrer and Steven R. Browning, of Spohrer, Wilner, Maxwell & Matthews, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants Robert Carter Connell and Connell & Son, Inc. argue that the trial court erred by (i) granting the appellees' motion for new trial, and (ii) admitting a driver's manual as evidence of the standard of care required when approaching a yellow flashing traffic light. We affirm the trial court's granting of appellee's motion for new trial because there was no abuse of discretion. However, we agree with appellants that the driver's manual should not have been admitted into evidence. See Sikes v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co., 429 So. 2d 1216 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)(ruling that driver's handbook should not have been admitted into evidence).

Affirmed in part and Reversed in part.

DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Connell v. Riggins
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jul 16, 2002
Citation: 820 So. 2d 1076
Docket Number: 1D01-3844
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.