History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ford v. State
763 So. 2d 1273
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2000
|
Check Treatment
763 So. 2d 1273 (2000)

James B. FORD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D00-2286.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

August 9, 2000.

*1274 James B. Ford, Century, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant's 1997 sentence as an habitual offender, as such sentences are not affected by the supreme court's decision in Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 2000) (revised opinion). An habitual offender sentence is not a guidelines sentence even where, as here, the actual sentence imposed coincides with the bottom of guidelines.

GUNTHER, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Ford v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Aug 9, 2000
Citation: 763 So. 2d 1273
Docket Number: 4D00-2286
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.