History
  • No items yet
midpage
Johnson v. State
2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1382
Mo. Ct. App.
2006
Check Treatment
202 S.W.3d 35 (2006)

STANLEY T. JOHNSON, Movant/Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent/Respondent,

No. ED 86907

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four.

September 19, 2006

Michelle Murphy Rivera, St. Louis, Missouri, for Appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Daniel Neal McPherson-co-counsel, Jefferson City, Missouri, for Respondent.

Before Roy L. Richter, P.J., Kathianne Knaup Crane, J. and Sherri B. Sullivan, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stanley T. Johnson (Appellant) appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his amended Rule 29.15[1] motion to vacate, set aside, or correct judgment and sentence. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Daugherty v. State, 159 S.W.3d 405, 407 (Mo.App. E.D. 2005). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

NOTES

[1] All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2006, unless otherwise indicated.

Case Details

Case Name: Johnson v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 19, 2006
Citation: 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1382
Docket Number: ED 86907
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.