History
  • No items yet
midpage
Baldwin v. Baldwin
576 So. 2d 400
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1991
|
Check Treatment
576 So. 2d 400 (1991)

John Douglas BALDWIN, Appellant,
v.
Darcy Sue BALDWIN, Appellee.

No. 90-786.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 14, 1991.

*401 Clyde M. Collins, Jacksonville, for appellant.

D. Patrick Dalton and Sherri F. Myers, Ocala, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying a change of custody of minor children. The discretion of a trial judge in such cases is wide and this court is very limited in its legal authority to reverse the decision. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980). Even though the appellate judges may sometimes disagree with a trial judge's discretionary call, that does not warrant our substituting our judgment for the one made below. Trial judges sit in closer proximity to the parties; they get to meet them and listen to them and their witnesses. We have only the record to read and no matter how persuasive it and the argument of counsel may be, there is no substitute for being there. Unless we determine that no reasonable judge would have done what was done, we must affirm. Canakaris.

AFFIRMED.

COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Baldwin v. Baldwin
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 14, 1991
Citation: 576 So. 2d 400
Docket Number: 90-786
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.