History
  • No items yet
midpage
McHarg v. Staake
1906 U.S. LEXIS 1525
| SCOTUS | 1906
|
Check Treatment
202 U.S. 150 (1906)

McHARG, RECEIVER, et al.,
v.
STAAKE.[1]

No. 214.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued March 15, 16, 1906.
Decided April 30, 1906.
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.

PER CURIAM:

As the facts in this case are practically the same as those set forth in the preceding and the legal principles are identical, this is also

Affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, MR. JUSTICE WHITE and MR. JUSTICE PECKHAM dissented in both cases.

NOTES

[1] This case was argued simultaneously with First National Bank v. Staake; for names of counsel see p. 144, ante.

Case Details

Case Name: McHarg v. Staake
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Apr 30, 1906
Citation: 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1525
Docket Number: 214
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.