History
  • No items yet
midpage
McDonald v. State
679 So. 2d 1273
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1996
|
Check Treatment
679 So. 2d 1273 (1996)

George Risdon McDONALD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 96-21.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

September 20, 1996.

George Risdon McDonald, Wewahitchka, Pro Se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Sonya Roebuck Horbelt, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges a sentence imposed after the court ordered resentencing pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The appellant had the right to be represented by counsel at this resentencing. Chestnut v. State, 578 So. 2d 27 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); see also State v. Scott, 439 So. 2d 219 (Fla.1983). Because the court did not comply with the appellant's request to be represented by counsel, the challenged sentence is vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: McDonald v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Sep 20, 1996
Citation: 679 So. 2d 1273
Docket Number: 96-21
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.